Prices in Japanese yen (JPY). K = thousand; M = million. Unit prices are per m² unless stated otherwise.

Land prices / Ehime / Imabari

2023–2025 published land transactions

Miyashitacho land prices and price trends

This page aggregates publicly released transactions classified as residential land (land only) for the address area Miyashitacho, Imabari. It does not limit transactions by the buyer's intended use.

Median transaction price per m² (2023–2025)
Median sample 4Five-year sample 7
Estimated price for 100 m²
Simple estimate using the displayed median
Estimated land + building budget
100 m² building using the 2025 benchmark
When the latest year has two or fewer transactions, the median uses the latest three years, then five years if needed. The land and total-budget estimates use the displayed median and a 100 m² model.

Miyashitacho location

Miyashitacho location map

The orange point is the neighborhood representative point. Green points are stations within 1.5 km straight-line distance.

Station
Loading map…

Select a station marker or label to open its station-area page. Overlapping labels appear when the marker is selected.

Price distribution (2023–2025)

Middle 50% price range
JPY 41,064 / m² – JPY 55,206 / m²JPY 41.064K / m² – JPY 55.206K / m²
Average transaction price
Reference segment: plots from 50 to 165 m² have 1 published transactions over five years, with a median of . This is a size-based segment; it does not identify residential use or individual buyers.

Estimated land price by plot size (2023–2025)

Plot sizeEquivalent in tsuboMedian estimateMiddle 50% estimate
50.0 m²15.1 tsubo –
100.0 m²30.3 tsubo –
150.0 m²45.4 tsubo –
200.0 m²60.5 tsubo –

These are simple land-only estimates calculated from the displayed median and quartile price per m², not medians of transactions at each plot size.

Land-price trend

Transaction medianOfficial land price
JPY/m²36K42K48K54K61K21222325
Year2021202220232025
Public transactions1
Indicative
2
Indicative
2
Indicative
2
Indicative
Official observations1111

Medians and changes can move sharply in years with few transactions.

2021–2025. Published transaction medians and MLIT residential official land-price observations are shown as separate series.

Official land-price observations (2025)

ObservationPublished locationOfficial price (JPY/m²)
MLIT official land-price observationOfficial observation 1

Source: MLIT Real Estate Information Library, official land-price point API ↗

Published land transactions (2023–2025)

PeriodAreaPricePrice / m²Road widthZoning
2025-10200.0 m²12.5 mCategory I exclusively low-rise residential zone
2025-07210.0 m²14.4 mCategory I exclusively low-rise residential zone
2023-07720.0 m²10.5 mCategory I exclusively low-rise residential zone
2023-04500.0 m²Not disclosedCategory I exclusively low-rise residential zone

Transactions are listed newest first. They are not filtered by residential intent or buyer type. Low unit price alone is not treated as atypical. “Value check” is limited to invalid values or extremely high unit prices and does not necessarily indicate an error.

Transaction prices by plot size (2023–2025)

CategoryPublished samplesMedian (JPY/m²)
Under 20 tsubo0No data
20–30 tsubo0No data
30–40 tsubo0No data
40 tsubo or more4

These are audited medians recomputed from the published transactions in the displayed period. Small groups can be strongly affected by individual transaction conditions.

Price by frontage-road width

Under 4 m
No data

0 published samples

4–6 m
No data

0 published samples

6–8 m
No data

0 published samples

8 m or more

3 published samples

A wider road does not by itself imply a higher price. Station access, zoning, plot size, shape and other conditions also differ.

Terrain, elevation and ground conditions

Center elevation
About 3.5 m
Elevation range within 500 m
41.0 m
Mean slope between samples
1.47°
Representative-point landform
Hills
Surface-ground amplification
1.00

How to interpret these values

Landform describes regional terrain, not the safety of an individual plot. Terraces are generally higher than surrounding lowlands; valleys and lowlands can collect water. Check local depressions, fill, drainage and official flood maps separately.

The sampled elevation range around Miyashitacho is about 41.0 m. Absolute elevation alone does not determine flood risk. Slopes may affect access, retaining walls and rainwater flow.

AVS30 indicates average ground stiffness to 30 m depth. A larger value generally indicates stiffer ground. An amplification factor above 1 indicates estimated amplification of shaking, not a building’s seismic performance or a requirement for ground improvement.

Check disclosure documents, current municipal hazard maps and plot-specific ground investigations. Conditions can vary within the same neighborhood.

Elevation samples around Miyashitacho

Minimum elevation
2.1 m
Maximum elevation
43.1 m
Sampling extent
±500 m east/west and north/south of the representative point
Sample points
25

These samples are not an area-weighted measurement within the neighborhood boundary.

Elevation source: Geospatial Information Authority of Japan ↗

Hazard information (observed representative-point data)

Representative point outside mapped area

Flood inundation (maximum assumed event)

Flood hazard is not shown at the representative point. Check the official map for an individual plot.

Official source ↗
Representative point outside mapped area

Landslide warning zone

Landslide hazard is not shown at the representative point. Check the official map for an individual plot.

Official source ↗
Representative point within mapped area

Liquefaction susceptibility

Hazard information is not shown at the representative point. Check the official map for an individual plot.

Official source ↗

Representative-point observations do not guarantee the safety of a specific plot. An “outside” result does not mean every location in the neighborhood is outside the mapped hazard.

Planning and redevelopment that may affect Miyashitacho

No neighborhood-specific public plan has been published on this page. Unverified plans and completion dates are not shown.

Only plans and policies published by public authorities are included. Their presence does not guarantee an effect on land prices. Source titles and summaries are omitted until reviewed English translations are available.

Zoning, building coverage and floor-area ratio

Planning GIS at the representative point: Category I exclusively low-rise residential zone · Building coverage 50% · Floor-area ratio 80%
Typical zoning in published transactions
Category I exclusively low-rise residential zone
Building coverage used in the model
50%
Floor-area ratio used in the model
80%

The GIS result describes one representative point, not the entire neighborhood. Model assumptions reflect typical transaction conditions. Verify regulations for the individual plot.

Source: MLIT planning GIS (FY2025) ↗

Estimate the land and building budget

Ehime public survey used for the initial building-cost setting
FY2025, 127 land-attached custom homes; derived from an average construction cost of JPY 35.23M and average floor area of 103.8 m².

The initial land and floor areas are each 100 m², adjustable in 1 m² steps. This is a comparison model, not the Japanese average or a guarantee of buildability. Displayed values are rounded; area calculations use unrounded conversions.

LAND PRICE EVIDENCE
Selected land area
100.0 m²
Comparable median
Published samples
3 records
Estimate confidence
Low

3 published transactions from Neighborhood, approximately 0.0 m²–200.0 m². Zoning: residential-use records preferred. Confidence: Low.

Overall neighborhood reference: JPY 48,400 / m². It remains visible for comparison and is not automatically treated as the selected-lot estimate.Overall neighborhood reference: JPY 48.4K / m². It remains visible for comparison and is not automatically treated as the selected-lot estimate.

Land price
Building cost
Ancillary allowance
Total estimate
Planning model: 100.0 m² building
The simple floor-area-ratio ceiling for a 100.0 m² lot is about 80.0 m². The selected model exceeds this simple ceiling; the total is a comparison scenario, not a buildable-plan estimate.

Ancillary costs are provisionally set at 10% of construction cost. Public transaction records are retained; selection only changes which records are used for this estimate.

Source: Japan Housing Finance Agency Flat 35 Survey ↗

100 m² plot × 50% building coverage × 80% floor-area ratio

Maximum building footprint: about 50 m²
Maximum gross floor area: about 80 m²

Simplified calculation; road access, setback, height-district and other site-specific restrictions are not included.

MadoryFloor plan design website

Miyashitacho land-price summary

The median published transaction price in Miyashitacho for 2023–2025 is . A 100 m² plot would therefore be about by simple multiplication. The period-change figure compares yearly transaction medians in 2021 and 2025.

Station-area land prices near Miyashitacho

Stations whose coordinates are within 1.5 km straight-line distance of this neighborhood's representative point, ordered by distance.

This is not the distance from an individual property or a walking-time catchment. Each station page aggregates the full areas of qualifying neighborhoods.

Sources and methodology

Land prices, transaction examples, trends and official land-price observations are based on public data. Small samples can be strongly affected by the conditions of individual transactions.

Source: MLIT Real Estate Information Library ↗

Compare land prices near Miyashitacho

Ordered by straight-line distance between neighborhood representative points.

NeighborhoodMedian (JPY/m²)Latest-year samples
Kitahoraicho1
Kitahiyoshicho1
Bekkucho3
Minamidaimoncho1
Taishocho2
Nakahiyoshicho1
Tokiwacho3
Kyoeicho1

Neighborhoods with similar median prices

NeighborhoodMedian / m²Period change100 m² estimateLatest-year records
MiyashitachoImabari-12.3%2
Honaicho-MiyauchiYawatahama+233.3%3
MinamitakaimachiMatsuyama+160.0%1
Mishima-ChuoShikokuchuo+13.0%1

These neighborhoods are selected by similarity of median price, not geographic distance. Compare the displayed observation periods and sample counts.